America is partitioned—yet by what? Race, religion, ideological group, instruction level: all are wellsprings of huge social disunity nowadays, as individuals progressively experience difficulty comprehension or identifying with those external their personality gatherings.

Yet, in reality, these personalities cover, meet and contend with one another in inadequately got ways. Would a school instructed Republican feel she shared all the more practically speaking with an individual Republican with a secondary school training, or a Democrat with a higher education? Does a Black Christian feel greater fondness with a white Christian or a Black skeptic?

A gathering of specialists set off to discover the responses to these inquiries in another investigation shared solely with TIME. In a review planned by George Mason University political specialist Justin Gest and led by the surveying firm Ipsos, members were given a progression of sets of theoretical Americans. These nonexistent individuals were portrayed by their political association—Republican, Democrat or Independent—just as their race or nationality, strict connection, and a few different qualities (excluding sexual orientation). For each matching, members were posed a straightforward inquiry: With which of these two people, Person An or Person B, do you feel like you share all the more practically speaking? Before we reveal to you the outcomes, we’ve reproduced this survey, in organization with the analysts who planned the first review, so you can perceive how you would have scored. (This is only a show, so your answers never leave your gadget and are not recorded or utilized in additional exploration.)

Do you think you share more for all intents and purpose with

Individual An or Person B?

Snap on the left or right

RACE/ETH.

RELIGION

Gathering

Training

Pair 1 of 20

In the first examination, an agent test of 3,500 Americans were surveyed in late October and early November of 2020, a period that traversed Election Day. After first sharing their own socioeconomics and political leanings, members were each given 10 of these kinds of pairings, which additionally noted whether the theoretical people lived in metropolitan, rural or country territories and whether they were brought into the world in the U.S.